Can European Data Protection Committee (EDSA) form a foot as a better committee of Irish Data Protection Authority when implementing General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)? The European Union court (ECG) decided on Wednesday: Yes. Luxembourg Judges justify it with the will of the European Union MLA. The latter had determined that “a case of analysis of a case should be fixed within the structure of the constant disagreement between the supervisory officers affected – as well as the scope of investigation conducted in this regard.
Advertisement
Data Protection Commission in Dublin (DPC) “fat fish” such as Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Tiktok & Co. Is responsible for his European headquarters in Ireland. However, it has long been considered a bottle neck in GDPR enforcement. DPC’s decision -templates often dispute in the Data Protection Committee. It triggers complex and long communication processes in which the Irish authority is usually rejected. In some cases, she does not want to let it go.
Decided in legal matters now T -70/23T-84/23 and T-111/23 December 2022 dealt with EDSA decisions. In short, it was about data protection rules that the American group used with their daughters’ Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. At that time, Meta had already offered opt-outs to evaluate user behavior on foreign websites and apps. At that time, however, users had no choice for the use of their personal information on Facebook and Instagram.
Meta wanted to spend a served advertisement as a service
For years, Meta created on the trick to output its own data mining as a performance for the concerned users. The DPC tried to influence the GDSA guidelines for the interpretation of GDPR in the sense of the platform operator. Finally, she wanted to shake Facebook’s consent move, which she did not find in EDSA. The merger of the state European data protection controllers also decided that the Irish Authority should also check the evaluation of sensitive data according to Article 9 GDPR for targeted advertisement. In November 2023, EDSA directed allies in Dublin to expand the Norwegian ban on behavior -advertisements throughout Europe.
The DPC already refused to follow the binding decision after the recession of the process of more than four years. In the ECG, he applied for a partial declaration of EDSA resolutions, as an innovar to conduct new studies on data processing related to Facebook, Instagram or WhatsApp using and work on the basis. Judges now dismissed complaints: Legal interpretation undoubtedly shows that EDSA is authorized to issue instructions like bringing elections.
DPC: Masterful Grotescribe Evasive Failure
The argument of the DPC that only national cuisine can only check objections regarding examination, according to the ECG is ineffective. It is important that the posts monitoring supervisory officers are as independent as they are. The latter is again an example that is independent of organs and other officials of the union. Both sides may appeal against the final decision so far within two months and ten days after delivery in the European Court (ECJ).
Max Shrems, President of Austrian Civil Rights Organization Noyb, who launched the case in 2018 with a complaint, is pleased with the decision. But it also means that the case “resumes after more than six years”, he said. By the final explanation of the legal status, it will probably be needed before DPC and again before Irish recipes. Irish supervision “Grotescue is a master of ethical maneuvers and is the process of loop, resulting in we never punish Big-Tech”. According to several complaints, the European Union Commission has also tried to solve the DPC problem.
(MKI)
