The renovation of European Regulation, especially in the field of artificial intelligence, was the subject of several discussions in the Munich Suraksha Sammelan (MSC). In front of the radical statements by the Old Transallantic Partner USA, European representatives immediately made up their ups and downs between objections and elimination of anxiety in the race for innovations.
Advertisement
Europe’s self-evaluation that the sheer shape of its own market allows him to “determine the pace of economic growth,” Mike Galagher said, the chief of defense under American surveillance MSC dayThe former Republican MP said, “In view of the lack of innovation in the field of artificial intelligence and software development, Europe is to be left behind.”
Not only are “the knee days in front of Brussels”, the block threatens through its regulatory approach in the “Cold War”, which is to unload the technology leadership on the losing class, Galagher said.
Europe Self -Critical
Ekaterina Zaharieva, Fresh Baked European Union Commissioner, for Start-ups, was held against Kabinett von dera leyen, against it. He referred to the ratioless ratio of researchers in the community: In five percent of the world’s population, members of the European Union spend 25 percent of researchers worldwide. In Europe, there are more patent than the USA and more startups.
But: Later, many of them gave it to USA due to better development opportunities. “We are ready for self -chrisism,” recognized and expressed Bulgarin: “We should find the right way between over -regulations and zero regulation.”
Henna Virkuns, vice -president of the European Union for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, assured the “simplification and harmony” of the digital law when he was already asked at the Munich Cyber Security Conference already concerned. In the first phase, you want to knock the laws on the possible overlaps on digital services and digital markets (DSA, DMA) and EU Acts. A real harmony in implementation is also for discussion.
C-Actor 1.2
Regulation is unavoidable that it is easy to balance for Democratic Society, said the head of Federal Office of Security, Claudia Planetar in Information Technology on the subject of AI. Nor could they do without regulation. They will then potentially override technology. They should still do without their own experiments and innovations. Because they will depend on others.
“I will like it,” Platenar’s petition said, “We are already working on version 1.2 of the Act. He said.
Professional software developer made concrete suggestions in the Munich era, which they consider in warm debate about freedom of expression, disintegration and AI: no account for bots, to labeling and order in AI -generated materials and signs in order To sign in to sign to sign the opportunity to sign the material.
“Technically, cryptographically, these are peanuts,” said platener. Of course, tech companies have to cooperate. Further measures can be labeling of personal opinion and company statements such as marking of payment material. Such additions for DSA will not spend anything, say platener, but will bring much transparency to users.
Cultural value in AI Regulation?
The Kent Walker, Google had objections to the suggestions of Planetar from the member of the Security Innovation Board of the Chairman Global Affairs and Munich Security Conference. Suggestions such as planetar must always have to be checked in advance for their effects. “Investigations have shown that users consider the material to be correct when using AI markings,” Walker said.
Globally asked about the globally harmonious criteria, Walker praised the work of OECD, GZ and UN, not at the end of each country, “At the end of each country,” its regulation for internet and other technologies at the end of each country Creates “which reflects the related cultural value”.
Market concentration is not innovation -money
The Times becomes difficult for regulators, warning to use the European Union-US, using Eba Kak, one of the directors of the AI Now Institute. Kak appealed to the European Union regulators not to give them under pressure from the new US administration. After discussing the superiority of less platforms for a decade, the concentration of AI technology in the hands of the same veterans should not only be accepted. Kak recalled the same procedures that the Federal Trade Commission had first started under the Biden administration. Virkantten, vice -president of the European Union, said that the concentration of the market and major technologies in the hands embarrass less players in an innovative, diverse market.
Also read
Internationally the goal, for example in the circle of G7, according to Kak, should be a dirty word that should be a dirty word that should be to combat the new credas issued by the Trump administration. “The perspective that all restrictions on the unlimited power of American tech groups are synonymous for our societies by giving China a profit in the race for technology leadership.”
(Never)
