The implementation of regulation for a European electronic identity (EUID) based on digital wall pockets (e-wallet) continues to ensure the vertebrae. The essential obligation by the European Union Commission, especially the European Union countries and Parliament, were controversial to design the Electronic Identification Proof (EID) as a lifetime passenger. The MLA eventually decided against the concept of “clear and permanent identifier” in online letters. However, the Commission now wants to present its views through the back door, with a legal act for the implementation of EIDAS regulation.
Advertisement
loud Article 11A of EIADS_ Regulation If the member states are considered to compare the clear identity of natural individuals, if the concerned states depend on the electronic identity of such people in cross -borer services. Is it after that Commission design for execution provisionsHowever, private companies should also be allowed to reach the identity examination on this sovereignty centralized service.
This should not only be possible if the identity of the user is determined by the national or European Union-wide law, but also clearly clearly “its own customer” matters. Of these, financial institutions are instructed to verify the identity of customers. On the top Credit Card Group Visa is insisting on relief here,
The Commission thus more than a red line and “beyond its boundaries”, Austrian Civil Rights Organization complains about epicenter.works. In a statementThe private sector was clearly excluded with comparison of identity within the meaning of regulation. The legislature has not usually provided a centralized system to compare identification with a clear and permanent license plate. The Commission wants to expand Article 11 and disregard the political agreement. Epicenter.Works demands: “To maintain confidence in eidas ecosystem and democratic process, these new provisions must be removed immediately.”
Personal indicators make citizens glasses
Critics are afraid that information from many areas of life can be brought together about comparison of lifetime indicators and civic glass can be formed. No one should be able to inspect eUID users centrally and can add information from areas such as e-tournament, banking, trip, travel by public transport or login on social networks. Empicenter.Works and UUDEM disregarded that the Commission provides further data records, further for identification comparison. This would almost identify sabotage, unless everyone involved saved the same alternative data record.
Together 14 other civil rights organizations such as European Digital Rights (EDRI) and Electronic Frontier Foundation Epicenter.works further criticizeThe scheduled public register of parties used by EUID is faulty. This means that the current provision does not provide a way to list all registered locations. It cannot recognize consumer advocates how employers or companies used identity. In this way, for example, Facebook will be possible to avoid protective measures and request all data from European users to wallets. In addition, the Commission had already watered the right to use the word pseudo with implementation files. The situation has deteriorated with the latest designs.
(DS)
