The traditional auction house of Christie, especially the first auction for AI art, is criticized for the campaign. In an open letter, around 3,000 artists have now called to cancel the auction. As a reason, you suggest that many generative AI equipment used to create art functions were trained with copyright functions without obtaining licenses for it. If those responsible for AI technologies are supported by institutions such as Christie, it will only create further encouragement by humans to “steal”.
Advertisement
Christie auction “Enhanced intelligence“It was announced last week; it should be held online from 20 February to 5 March. Is the person responsible.
Critically It means against itMany models of AI which were used in the manufacture of works and companies responsible for it take advantage of artists. To train models, art works were used without permission or payment, for the purpose of competing with artists.
Criticism of christy Opposite techcrunch Contradictory and insured that art functions were used only for improvement. In addition, she was trained only with her works. In the article together However, the house AI tools tells Dal-E, midzorney and stable spread, for which it does not apply.
(MHO)
