Tempo limit

A single vague signage of speed range does not mean that a driver can rely on a disregard to avoid punishment. The High Regional Court (OLG) Frankfurt AM has confirmed this approach. Under some circumstances, traffic criminals should expect to receive, resulting in a high punishment.

Advertisement

Tartison introduces foldable instant camera in a retro look

86 km/h. Very fast

In a specific case, a temporary speed range of 60 km/h was set on a motorway for truck control. This occurred due to folding signals that were connected to the highway and can be excluded if necessary. The plaintiff ignored the signals and went into the measurement of 146 km/h. This was followed by a fine of 900 euros and three -brain driving ban. On the other hand, the man legally defended himself on several examples. He may have misunderstood the signage because it was very misleading. Defense justifies its approach, which is fully confused by presenting images of signage. A speed restriction at 60 km/h and the restriction on overtaking for trucks and buses is arranged on it.

Cognitively able to participate in road traffic?

OLG Frankfurt AM at the main end dismissed the legal complaint of the man. The court did not want to follow the man’s argument in the context of a complete confusing signage. Whoever believes in confusing such clear signage, should think about whether they are still able to participate in road traffic, the court argued. In addition, someone who is traveling in “uncertain and uncertain” traffic conditions and “does not understand anything” will be stopped at permanent caution and mutual reception. So if you do not want to understand these signs or do not want to understand, you will work actively. Those who drive 146 instead of 60 km/h, they decide to ignore the rules and the situation of traffic according to the argument of the decision. For the purpose of the legal system, he consciously threatens and wanted others and it alone to his rapid progress.

Since it was a legal complaint, the court was obliged for the fine fixed by the lower court. Contrary to legal regulation, there was no doubling, as the fall in the case is banned. OLG’s decision is low File number 2 orbs 4/25 Can be seen and cannot be challenged. The plaintiff should bear all procedural costs.

(MFZ)

Balkan Power Plant Memory Anchor Solarbank 2 AC in Testing