Between claims and reality: Cyber ​​security strategies of parties

On the occasion of the initial Bundestag elections, AG Critical Inn has analyzed the posts of parties for cyber security and also asked everyone. “Unfortunately, Democratic parties did not respond to our request in terms of content, but referred to an over -active consensus, according to which the election test stones are accepted and answered by only 30 non -transparent organizations. The coalition Sahara Wagonacchat directly replied to specific questions about IT security, flexibility and crisis provision.

Advertisement

Sovereign Cloud: Europe requires a sovereign cloud code of conduct

In questions, the questions from the point of view of the parties to the “state and administration” sector in relation to the law of implementation of NIS2 instructions and in the Center Act, for the improvement of computer criminal law, is until the improvement of computer criminal law. Provide legal protection for voluntary work.

Another focus of questions was on the requirements of personnel and capacity in the IT sector within the state and its administration. The parties were asked how they want to carry forward the development and ability of personnel and how they stand for the improvement of collective agreement for public service (tvöd) who reach the pay levels of IT experts in the reality of the market economy Are.

Freedom of BSI?

In addition, the subject of freedom of the federal office is taken for security in Information Technology (BSI). Parties should explain their concepts to implement this goal. In his assessment, the parties were also asked whether Germany had the ability to compete enough for major damage situations due to cyber incidents. In addition, you should interpret your position to implement “Cyberhilfswerk” concept and current feasibility study in the Technical Relief Agency (Thw).

Due to lack of answer AG critic has triedParties to answer their questions based on election programs. Among other things, it was revealed that SPD is planning a charitable law for nationwide and cross-sectoral requirements for conservation of important infrastructure. In addition, it wants to strengthen the interrelations between municipalities, countries, federal government and operators as well as the powers of security officers. The BSW demands effective cyber security and uniform IT safety standards, with special attention to special facilities at small municipalities and country levels. FDP emphasizes protection against foreign influence, “the principle of safety by the design” and the security interval and the liability for the intended weakness management.

AFD asks for a federal strategy for open source techniques and digital sovereignty with federal hardware and software. CDU/CSU has planned a federal department ministry to burn the responsibilities. Greens and Left do not make any specific statements on this subject. CDU/CSU wants to establish BSI as the third column of cyber security architecture along with the conservation of the Constitution and BKA under the leadership of the Interior Ministry. The SPD has planned its expansion in the central office with increased efficiency against cyber crime. Greens asks for a cyber security law and a more independent role of BSI. Left and BSWs also support the independence of BSI, demanding upgradation to the highest federal authority with BSW parliamentary control and warns the struggle of interest from BMI dependence.

Lack of skill and administration

According to election programs, SPD depends on a nationwide home office, job sharing, part -time model, permanent positions and learning lifetime. BSW emphasizes fair payment, career changer and flexible working conditions. CDU/CSU uses AI for more efficient administration and competitive salary. The FDP declares exceptions from the prohibition of improvement for highly qualified experts according to the Sprind model. Greens rely on modernization, automation and decrease in ministerial administration. The Left stressed on cooperation and adequately funded public budget with the unions.

Changes in hacker paragraphs

Greens want to implement European guidelines for low cyber security in bureaucracy and create legal certainty for safety research. The IT safety research rejects calls, state trojan and chat checks to the left for decrying research and wants to shut down safety intervals without exception. BSW IT criticizes the current regulation on the “intentions to determine the safety intervals” due to evidence problems and calls to the IT security researchers.

Cyber ​​defense and population security

CDU/CSU plans to interlock regular cyber exercises with civil and military skills at all administrative levels. AFD demands aggressive cyber skills for Bundesvehar. BSW emphasizes the relationship with THW for the expansion of civil population safety, the role of AG Critis and the synergy effects. For example, greens rely on modern cyber aid and a warning infrastructure. The FDP rejects state trozons and asks for a systematic weakness management and establishing skills in software and hardware. Parties vary in their weight, especially between security aspects and freedom and data protection rights.

Although the parties recognize the importance of cyber security, however, the solutions vary and leave a lot to be desired, as AG says: “It is a high time that it takes responsibility for the safety of the population. Goes, “AG-said. Critic- Spokesperson Manual Atug. Therefore, AG Critis “says as a prevention of a strict defensive cyber security strategy in all municipalities, countries and federal government as the creation of real copy abilities with a prevention. A major damage caused by cyber phenomena” .

(Mac)