American competition: Learning platform criticizes Google’s AI overview

An online learning platform of California complains against Google. Cheg has a look at the AI ​​overview. This is the region that Google initially indicates only above the actual search results in the USA, the summary generated an AI for a search. As usual for AI-related materials, these error can occur. This criticizes the cheg. Because those who seek help, they will get wrong information in doubt. However, Cheg criticized that they are missing customers and clicks as AI summit is available, which are available from the materials of Google.

Advertisement

Google Underumine is on one side demand for original material and on the other hand there is an opportunity to compete with the observation for publishers, it is said in solid words. The cheg also fears that the entire information ecosystem will harm the answers that are incredible. Meanwhile, American users complain that they do not want to see the AI ​​overview at all.

Google AI uses all ingredients for overview

To offer AI overview, Google uses information from various websites and is trained in the case of AI, Google. This is usually everything that is freely available on the Internet. Before the generative AI was very far away, it was like this: Google showed appropriate websites in the search results, the fans had to be in their favor to learn more. The click usually brought money for website operators as they could play advertisements.

Because of Trump: Call for “Serious Steps towards Alternative Software”

It has always been suspicious that Google is also responsible for advertising market even on a large scale. In addition, there has always been a discussion about the supporting copyright law, or the question is whether Google can use the material to search without paying the manufacturers. The latter rule is usually that Google argues that they only bring people to sides, that is, take care of traffic and thus advertising revenue.

Now this discussion with a generous AI goes a step ahead. Because material manufacturers often lack clicks, when Google already provides detailed explanation on questions in AI overview. The process becomes suspicious, even if the contents of the websites are used for overview. Therefore, website operators can decide not to provide their content.

Accusation: Violation of competition law

But According to Reuters, the plaintiff saysGoogle Zwinge to provide their content to publishers and material manufacturers. You can not only appear on Google or be available for AI overview. This competition is a violation of the law. There it was said that it was “forbidden to sell the product dependent on the fact that the customer sells or gives a separate product to his supplier”.

In addition to the complaint of the learning platform, there is another case against Google and AI overview from a newspaper in Arkansas. This is a class action lawsuit, reports of Reuters, for which the judge is responsible, which also decided that Google kept an illegal monopoly in online search.

Meanwhile, the people of the United States are rapidly complaining that they do not want an AI overview anyway. Frequent materials are criticized-a designed aircraft train in Japan from petrol-cake pasta, there is also a lot of rubbish. Google has introduced itself a function to search itself without roar, with which you can only find the text-based material from the web. To find them, you have to call “more” options on Google Home.

Permanently to get rid of AI North of Google, it attacks Blog tedium Parameter in front of Google URL to hang “UDM = 14”. So you end in web search.

(EMW)