For the fourth time, British Oberhaus has rejected a draft law of the lower home, providing copyright-reserved tasks for AI training. With 221 to 116 votes, rejection on Wednesday was clear as the previous votes in June and May, but the criticism becomes rigid. Film director and MPs raised for nobility Beban Kidron already said“She” is disappointed, disappointed and, to be honest, to make their arguments quite unhappy “. The plan made here is nothing more with the help of” comprehensive theft “. Despite interrogation, the government did not explain what should be done against the fact that the material has been stolen.
Labor government is not ready to compromise
The British Labor Government made plans at the end of last year and has already criticized a lot. With a barrier regulation, AI companies such as Openaai, Google, Meta & Co. To train your language model should be made easier to train: the right holder must first actively face his objection to the creative and right holder as well as the rights holder to prevent copyright-reserved tasks for AI training. With its large majority in the lower house, the ruling Labor Party has now sent the law several times to the upper house, where it has been rejected four times. Labor has no majority. But it only has a suspicious effect.
A few days ago, the former head of communication in the meta group created enthusiasm when he said that the AI ​​industry was at the end, it would always seek permission before AI training. On the other hand, he considers an opt-out that the British government provides for this. Sometimes a large scale criticism of plans in the United Kingdom is also listed by artists. After the recent coordination in the upper house, singer Elton John assured that no one would be kept down, Quotes the guardianSo far, it does not seem that the government is ready for concessions.
BKA Law: Schwarz-Rot wants to allow “precautionary” data storage to the police
(MHO)
