US government: low impact on stage operators

0
15
US government: low impact on stage operators


US President Donald Trump emphasized as part of his video appearance on the World Economic Forum in Davos to prevent all the impact of the US government on the discourse on social media by the US government. “On the first day I signed a decree to end all censorship through the government,” Trump said in his address on Thursday, which was otherwise determined by business issues and self -praise.

Advertisement

After safety gap in D-Trust: CCC talks about “cyber window dressing”After safety gap in D-Trust: CCC talks about “cyber window dressing”


Shortly after his inauguration on Monday, Trump was one Decree Said “to restore freedom and end the federal government”. The federal government and officials are banned from the law of American citizen protected by the Constitution, “false information or excuse to fight disintegration”.

The previous US government had significant compulsion for third party such as social media providers, so that they would liberalize or suppress unwanted statements by the government, removing or suppressed, “on Monday calls the new US President’s executive order. Nominated US Justice Minister Palm Bondi should now investigate it and submit a report. Trump’s candidate Bondi has not yet been confirmed by the US Senate.

“Our government will no longer mark the statements of our own citizens as wrong information or disintegration”, Trump said, which was switched through the video On Thursday as part of the World Economic Forum. “These are the favorite conditions of those who want to stop the free exchange of ideas and progress.”

While an direct censorship by the US government has not been proved in recent years, among other things, the insight into the “Twitter files” processed by American journalists, which has put political pressure on companies through officials or government.

During the corona epidemic, the White House directly pressured Twitter management. The social network then limits themselves to experts if they get distracted from the government line. Twitter founder Jack Dorsi spoke for greater freedom of expression at that time and described the lock of the user account of Trump as a mistake.

Meta Boss Mark Zuckerberg has recently reported influence from the White House. In view of the change of power in the White House, Zuckerberg has determined a change of course for its company and changed the moderation rules. While the meta inserts the “fact check” outside in the USA, they initially live in Europe.

The US government threatened and has now also appointed courts in the United States from federal officials to forum operators. In a process in the state of Missouri, the competent court still agreed with the plaintiff and the government officials (Missouri et we biden et al, az .: 3: 22 -CV -01213) Was banned.

In the summer of 2024, however, the US Supreme Court collected the court’s decision of the decision and appeal. Most people of the chamber missed out on detecting a reason between influence and moderation decisions. In separate assessment, three judges saw this evidence, provided in at least one caseAZ.,

Neena Janakoviz of the lobby Organization American Sunlight Project criticized CNN that Trump normalized his decree “lies and principles of conspiracy”. Under the government of the two, Janakoviz was summarized by “Dysineformation Governance Board”, which was located in the Ministry of Security, which critics referred to as a censorship authority and resolved after a few weeks.

Medium critics indicate that a large part of contact between officers and stage operators affect criminal areas and not freedom of expression. These options should not be restricted for exchange.


(VBR)

Judgment: Google liable as a tortfeasor for fraudulent advertisements under DSAJudgment: Google liable as a tortfeasor for fraudulent advertisements under DSA

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here